The NLP model achieved an F1 score of 0.80, indicating high accuracy in capturing pediatrician adherence to guidelines. This approach allows for scalable measurement of quality-of-care in ADHD treatment, potentially improving clinical care for chronic conditions.
The study found no significant improvements in clinical symptoms or cognitive performance in the group receiving anodal tDCS compared to the sham group, indicating that the treatment was ineffective.
The study found that ADHD-Rating Scale and Conners ADHD Index scores were significantly lower at post-treatment after sham tDCS compared to real tDCS, indicating no cognitive or symptom improvements from the treatment.
Higher resilience and life satisfaction were observed in ADHD asymptomatic dental students compared to symptomatic ones, indicating that resilience can improve life satisfaction.
In children with ADHD, methylphenidate decreased connectivity measures in the striatum and thalamus, while in adults, it increased these metrics. This suggests age-dependent effects of methylphenidate on brain connectivity in ADHD patients.
Children who played RW showed improved rhythmic abilities and executive functioning compared to those who played a control game. Improvements were positively related to the duration of gameplay, indicating that longer engagement led to better outcomes.
The expected positive outcomes include improved diagnostic accuracy for ASD and ADHD through the integration of crowdsourced behavioral tagging and machine learning. The system aims to provide timely and accessible diagnostic services, particularly for underserved populations, thereby enhancing the overall understanding and identification of these developmental disorders.
Children receiving SEA showed a statistically significant reduction in psycho-social difficulties, with an average improvement of 0.1 standardized mean deviation in difficulties by age eight.
Both face-to-face sessions with masks and telepsychiatric sessions were considered valid options for continuing treatment during the pandemic. Patient preferences and session content were highlighted as important factors in determining the most suitable treatment modality.
Participants showed significant improvements in cognitive assessment scores, particularly in attention, response inhibition, and working memory, after three months of participation in the at-home program, comparable to those in the in-center program.